Cablevision: Good Sports?

August 8th, 2007, filed by Franklin Paul

Reuters File PhotoTime out for a sports story.

After all, pro sports teams are more than just scores and images on a TV screen — in many cases they are strategic pieces of a media conglomerates master plan. (e.g., Tribune owns the Cubs, Liberty Media has the Atlanta Braves, etc.)

If you are a frustrated New York Knicks fan, you know that the team hasn’t had a winning season in 6 years, and hasn’t reached the NBA playoffs since 2004. That means fewer playoff tickets revenue for team owners Cablevision, not to mention lost advertising revenue on its MSG Network cable station, and none of the beautiful people sitting on the sidelines of games.

Chin up! The company said in the second quarter, it scored higher combined revenue for the Knicks and Rangers (Hockey Team, which made the playoffs) and higher adjusted operating cash, thanks to Rangers ticket sales and lower spending on team personnel.

Cablevision executives, on a conference call suggested the best is yet to come, especially with addition of new player Zach Randolph — who missed the end of the ‘06-’07 season after undergoing surgery to repair ligaments and remove bone fragments in his right hand.

“Both the Knicks and Rangers continue to build on their strategy for long-term success. The Knicks sold out 17 of their last 20 regular season games….
We expect these trends to continue for the upcoming season.”

In the end, profits are up, but will long suffering Knicks fans have to wait a little longer to get a taste of the playoffs?

Leave a Reply

We are having some issues with spam. If your comment does not get moderated it might be that it was stopped by our spam filters. Try to avoid using words like "ringtone", "viagra", "blackjack" and others that fit this pattern - i.e. common spam. Sorry for this crude censorship, but there is little we can do.
 
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Limited is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.